There is a thread in the BLS 2009 sub-forum on treasurer functions that's spawned this discussion.
Put simply: A center is requiring a league (all leagues?) to pay the final two weeks' lineage no later than the tenth week of the season.
ABC, as far as I know, had not gotten involved in contractual issues with proprietors, and USBC after that, and I know of no rule, for example, prohibiting a bowler from practicing on his own pair prior to actual league play. Such a rule would infringe on a proprietor's right to business, should the only pair available be the one on which the bowler wants to do open play. That aside...
Going back to the original requirement: I'm wondering if the center might be forcing a league to go beyond the scope of USBC rules on payments. Put specifically, if a league collects lineage and prize fund payments from bowlers, all prize fund monies must be deposited in a timely manner. I don't know if prize monies can be tapped to pay lineage, especially for bowling that has not yet occurred. (Yes, I know of leagues that require advance payments for individual bowlers--all bowlers in a league, of course). If the league hasn't collected advance lineage from the bowlers, then effectively there are no funds that can be rightly applied toward lineage, I'd suggest.
I suppose the league contract can require the league to adopt such a by-law requiring advance dues payments by bowlers from which the advance payment to the house might occur, but without that, I don't see how it can work. A league that pays dues out of its prize funds would be violating the trust placed on it by its bowlers, unless the bowlers know and agree to it.
I do hope that the center applies this rule to all leagues and not selectively to first-season leagues, or leagues of a certain size or makeup.
Thoughts?


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks